Wake-up call: duplicate Camp Lejeune claims have surpassed 10%
Erin Hively
Oct 13, 2022
Mass Torts 360 Overview
Camp Lejeune
Boy Scouts of America
Mass Torts 360 Overview
Camp Lejeune
Boy Scouts of America
Just three weeks after the PACT Act was signed, SimplyConvert found that 7% of Camp Lejeune clients had signed with multiple law firms. Six weeks later, that number had surpassed 10%. Camp Lejeune advertising is seemingly everywhere, and clients who have not heard from their lawyers are looking elsewhere for help.
This is a wake-up call for lawyers who are not communicating with their clients: the number of dually-represented clients will skyrocket if law firms don’t start paying attention now.
In a September 27th email to lawyers working on Camp Lejeune claims, an attorney with the Navy Tort Claims Unit urged attorneys to check for clients who may have signed with multiple law firms.
“Most law firms have internal methods to detect duplicate claims, however, claimants may become confused about their status as clients and either hire another attorney to represent them and/or file a pro se claim,” she wrote. “We’ve already caught a few. Please make sure you are providing [the] claimant’s address, phone number, and email information, either on the claim form or via the permissive CSV file as TCU uses that information to detect duplicate claims. If you fail to provide that information, TCU will accept the claim as “properly presented”/ ”perfected,” however, the lack of information may result in TCUs inability to detect a duplicate claim filed by another firm, or by the claimant themselves.”
She noted that duplicate filings for a claimant could have serious negative impacts.
“Please note that while TCU attempts to screen duplicate claims and notify impacted attorneys, it is not our responsibility to do so. Further, as [a] practice pointer and to drive home the importance of good data, if a claimant files two claims for the same injury one as a pro se claim and the other through their attorney, depending on the circumstances, there could be serious adverse legal consequences for the claimant. I, personally, would not want to risk a claimant filing a pro se claim that undercuts the one filed by their attorney on their behalf.” (bold/italics added)
If your client previously signed with another firm, or if they retain another firm after signing your contract for any number of reasons, your firm and the other firm will both end up investing valuable time and money into developing the client’s case. The more time and money invested, the more difficult it will be to unravel.
Moreover, you never want to be in a situation where opposing counsel is notifying you about dually-represented clients. The sooner these issues are addressed, the better the outcome will be for all parties. Ultimately, the client will need to decide which firm will represent them going forward — whether that’s your firm, the other firm, or both with a co-counsel agreement.
Discovering duplicate representation issues before firm resources are spent and putting measures in place to prevent new duplicate representation issues will protect your firm from major headaches and save significant time and money in the long run.
So what should firms do? Here are five tips for addressing dual representation issues now, while preventing them in the future:
Find existing duplicate representation issues in your Camp Lejeune client inventory now and utilize the tips above to prevent them from happening in the future. You’ll be happy you did so early on this litigation knowing you’ve saved yourself and your clients from serious frustration down the road.